
It is illegal under both Federal and State Law
to discriminate in the "terms or conditions of employment" on the
Basis of a person's race or color.
"Terms or conditions of employment"
means just about anything relating to someone's job: their position,
pay, title, hours, vacations, most everything is a term or condition
of employment. Whether or not a person is hired is also considered
a term or condition of employment.
Race is generally defined as a person's
ancestry or ethnic characteristics. Everyone is some race or color.
This means that it is illegal to discriminate against anyone, if the
basis is their race or color.
Employment race discrimination in the
workplace based on association with people of a particular race is
also prohibited. For instance, if an employer fired a white employee
because she had black friends, or was dating a black man, the white
woman would have a discrimination suit, whether or not the employer
is prejudiced against whites.
It is also illegal to discriminate on the
basis of "color". In one case, an employer hired a
"light-complexioned" black applicant with "Caucasian features" over
another black applicant who had a "dark complexion" and "Negroid
features". This was also against the law, even though in a strict
sense one race wasn't being preferred over another.
There are two types of race discrimination
in the workplace: "disparate treatment" and "disparate impact"
.
Disparate Treatment, Race Discrimination
In The Workplace
"Disparate treatment" is
straightforward discrimination. Simply put, it is treating a person
differently because of a
protected class,
like sex or race.
Disparate Impact, Discrimination In The
Workplace
Disparate Impact Discrimination is more
complicated. "Disparate Impact" is where some type of company
policy excluded a certain individual or individuals from the job or
from promotions. The policy wasn't designed to exclude them; that
was just the unfortunate result.
One example arose often in fire
departments. These agencies had various strength requirements for
job applicants. Women were frequently unable to meet these
requirements. In some instances, the requirements were absolutely
necessary to ensure the firefighters were qualified. But in many
instances, the requirements were simply too high; the were more than
was necessary. Qualified women were therefore being excluded
unnecessarily. This does not mean the fire departments were
necessarily trying to exclude women. That was just the result of
their policy; it had a disparate impact upon women. Because the
policy wasn't sufficiently job-related (too much strength was
required) there was discrimination.
|